Impact on Illinois' Structural Deficit

Impact on Illinois' Structural Deficit
Released

The state of Illinois faces a significant structural deficit into the future. The report highlights the nature of the structural deficit and identifies two key causes: the state’s historically flawed  tax policy and the plan devised for repayment of Illinois’ pension debt. CTBA proposes both the adoption of the Fair Tax and a reamortization of the pension debt as described in the report titled: Addressing Illinois’ Pension Debt Crisis With Reamortization. Doing so would allow the State to ensure full funding for the Evidence Based Funding Formula while also improving the status of Illinois’ public employee pension system and eliminating the State’s structural deficit by 2042.

FY2015 Illinois Budget Proposals: In Context

FY2015 Illinois Budget Proposals: In Context
Released

Presentation on the FY2015 budget proposals given at the National Associatioin of Social Workers Advocacy Day in Springfield, Illinois.

Governor's FY2015 Proposed General Fund Appropriations ($ Millions)

 

 

Issue Brief: How Does Illinois Spending on Public Services Compare to Other States?

Issue Brief: How Does Illinois Spending on Public Services Compare to Other States?
Released

Recent projections show that the state of Illinois will run a deficit ranging from $7.59 to $7.96 billion in Fiscal Year (FY) 2014. This is, however, nothing new. According to the Comptroller’s Office, the state has run a deficit in its General Fund every year since at least FY1991. This creates genuine cause for concern, since over $9 out of every $10 spent through the General Fund goes to four core service areas: education (35 percent), healthcare (29 percent), human services (20 percent), and public safety (6 percent).

Given that the state’s General Fund deficits have been sustained over such a long period of time, many believe that spending on those core services in Illinois must be exceedingly high, and hence a major reason why the state experiences recurring budget shortfalls. The data on spending, however, paint a very different picture. When considered over the long-term, it is clear that General Fund spending on services in Illinois is actually declining in real terms after adjusting for inflation. 

Reducing spending in real terms over time could be an appropriate path to follow if service spending in the state was exceptionally high or overly generous compared to service spending in other states. However, under any objective evaluation, Illinois ranks near the bottom nationally in its spending on core services, which means that reducing investments in real terms over time is not an appropriate way to deal with the state’s deficits. 

This Issue Brief compares Illinois’ General Fund (GF) spending on services to other states using three metrics: (i) per capita; (ii) as share of state Gross Domestic Product (GDP); and (iii) number of state employees per 1,000 residents. Under each metric, Illinois ranks as one of the lowest spending states in the nation.  

Analysis of the FY2014 General Fund Budget

Analysis of the FY2014 General Fund Budget
Released

The fiscal problems that have historically plagued Illinois are on full display in the FY2014 General Fund budget passedby the Illinois General Assembly. The state’s accumulated deficit remains significant, and in all likelihood will be at least $8 billion by the end of FY2014. Despite increases for some aspects of the General Fund budget, net spending on services will be $173 million less in FY2014 than in FY2013. Meanwhile, as spending on service delivery continues to decline, the annual cost of debt service continues to grow—specifically the debt owed to the state’s five public pension systems. 

All of these problems can be traced back to the state’s flawed tax policy, which creates inadequate revenue growth to maintain service levels from one year to the next. This means that, even when spending on services are held constant in real, inflation-adjusted terms over time, deficits nonetheless materialize due to insufficient revenue growth. This makes it incredibly difficult for Illinois to provide public services at the levels needed to meet the demographic needs of the state. But as difficult as things are now, given current law on state tax policy, they are about to get much worse. 

That is because the temporary income tax increases passed as part of the Taxpayer Accountability and Budget Stabilization Act of 2011 (PA 96-1496)1 will begin to phase out in fiscal years 2015 and 2016. Unfortunately for Illinois, the additional revenue being generated from those temporary tax increases are all that stand between state government and insolvency. Consider that the accumulated deficit projected for the FY2014 General Fund will be at least $8 billion, even with the revenue from the temporary tax increase. That means 32.5 percent of the $24.5 billion in scheduled spending on services for FY2014 is in reality deficit spending. If Illinois did not have the revenue from the 2011 temporary tax increases over the last three fiscal years, and spending were held constant, the state’s accumulated deficit in FY2014 would be $33 billion—meaning the deficit would be $8.5 billion more than total service appropriations.

For too long, Illinois has tried to resolve its structural fiscal problems with temporary fixes, service cuts and irresponsible practices—like borrowing against the pensions. All, predictably, to no avail. The FY2014 General Fund budget makes it abundantly clear that the time for half measures has passed. To solve its structural problems Illinois must enact comprehensive tax reform that simultaneously: (i) generates adequate new revenue to sustain investments in core services over time; (ii) taxes citizens more fairly; and (iii) otherwise comports with the principles of sound taxation for a modern economy.

CTBA's Testimony and Presentation to the Pension Conference Committee

CTBA's Testimony and Presentation to the Pension Conference Committee
Released

The Illinois Pension Conference Committee, the 10-member legislative group charged with forging a compromise solution to pension problems, held its second hearing on July 3, 2013. At that hearing CTBA's Executive Director Ralph Martire testified on CTBA's proposed solution to amortize the debt owed to the retirement systems (the unfunded liabilities) to create a feasible repayment schedule.

Funding a Quality Education Requires Fiscal Reform

Funding a Quality Education Requires Fiscal Reform
Released

Providing a quality public education to  is essential. It also is expensive. The way Illinois currently funds education guarantees that many school districts will not have the financial wherewithal to fund and deliver a quality education. The reason for this is simple. Illinois is over-reliant on property taxes as a revenue source for funding education. This Fact Sheet provides information on how Illinois could reform its fiscal system to provide equitable education funding.