logo2

 
Weekly Review
Forward the Weekly Review using the forward link at the bottom of the page!
 
September 16, 2008
 
 
Quick Links
CTBA Website
Weekly Review Archive
 
In This Issue
House Overrides Governor's Amendatory Veto of Ethics Bill
House Votes to Sweep $221 Million in Special State Funds to Restore Some Budget Cuts
House Passes Legislation to Lease Lottery
Speak at a Local School Funding Reform Hearing
Calendar of Events
 
Campaign Funding Reform
 

 
ethicsHouse Overrides Governor's Amendatory Veto of Ethics Bill

 
Rep. Fritchey files five bills to debate
amendatory veto language appropriately


Senate Action Unknown
 

Last week, the House voted to override the Governor's amendatory veto of HB 824, the campaign funding reform bill.

The original bill, which would have banned businesses with more than $50,000 in state contracts from making political donations to constitutional officers who award the contracts and candidates for those offices, was entirely rewritten by the Governor.  Groups such as the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform called on the legislature to override the Governor's amendatory veto.

How did the Governor rewrite (or amendatory veto) the original bill?


1.       The Governor issued an executive order, which the bills lead sponsor in the House
          calls unconstitutional.   
The original bill only banned political donations by state contractors 
          to those officer holders that oversaw the contract.  The Governor's expanded this by executive
          order to ban political donations from ANY contractor with a contract worth $50,000 or more at
          any agency from giving to not only the Governor but all other statewide officeholder, lawmakers
          and political parties. 

The amendatory veto override in the House did not deal with the executive order because it is believed to be unconstitutional.  State Representative John Fritchey (D-11), the lead sponsor of the bill in the House, told CTBA Monday he is fairly confident the executive order is both unconstitutional and unenforceable.


2.     The Governor's amendatory veto prohibits "Dual Employment."  The amendatory veto
        states:

        "No member of the General Assembly, during the term for which he has been elected or
         appointed may be employed by the State, a municipality, or unit of local government. This
         prohibition does not extend to employment as an elected official, firefighter, police officer, school
         counselor, teacher, or university instructor."

3.    The Governor's amendatory veto requires lawmakers to vote to approve a pay raise. 
       Currently, lawmakers pay raises go into affect unless they vote the raise down.

4.    The Governor's amendatory veto deals with lobbying activities by requiring legislators and
       candidates for the General Assembly to disclose lobbying activity by themselves and their
       spouses before boards, commissions, or units of local government.

Cindi Canary, director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform told the State Journal Register, "If we are saying we should be regulating money and politics, then step back and do it holistically, not just carve out groups of people, Illinois should be learning from the best practices of other states rather than set up some kind of cockamamie system."  In a press release issued by the Campaign, Canary said, "If taxpayers want fairness in government and want to stop pay-to-play politics, we're going to have to fight for an override of this veto. The governor claims he will strengthen HB 824 with an amendatory veto and executive order, but it is apparent he is trying to bypass the legislative process, rather than work towards real reform. Some of his proposed changes have merit and should be debated as separate bills. In the meantime, the General Assembly should reject his veto and put the most important reform in state statutes."  Read the entire press release here.

Representative John Fritchey did just what Canary suggested.  On September 10th, Fritchey filed five more ethics bills to thoroughly debate each issue.  The first contains all of the Governor's amendatory veto in one bill and four others deal with each issue separately.  The new bills are:

HB 6700:  All four changes proposed by the Governor 

HB 6701: Requires the General Assembly to approve or reduce a pay raise for it to take effect.

HB 6702Prohibits campaign contributions from a business entity with a state contract of more than $50,000 to any political committee (i) established to promote the candidacy of a State executive branch constitutional officer,legislator, or candidate for one of those offices or (ii) of a state central committee represented by a State executive branch constitutional officer or legislator.

HB 6703:  Requires members of and candidates for the General Assembly to disclose information concerning lobbying activities and representation cases on their statements of economic interests.

HB 6704:  Prohibits members of the General Assembly from being employed by the State, a municipality, or a unit of local government.

Senate to Act??
The Senate now has fifteen days to act, or HB 824 dies.  Or does it?  Senate President Jones has stated he will not call the Senate back into session to take up the legislation.  According to the Chicago Tribune, "Jones' reasoning is that the Senate's 15-day window for taking action doesn't open until the House report has been entered into the Senate record, which will happen when the Senate reconvenes Nov. 12. There's no reason to call his members to Springfield sooner to second the House action."

The Tribune also points out that, "Roughly half of the gazillion legal experts who were asked to weigh in on the matter Friday agreed with Jones' interpretation of the state constitution. The other half didn't. The General Assembly's Legislative Research Unit came down squarely on the side of ambiguity, pointing out that delegates who drew up the constitution "probably did not imagine every scenario."

Additionally the editorial states, "Before the law goes into effect, however, one of the lawyers who thinks Jones is wrong files a lawsuit, to the delight of Jones and Blagojevich. The governor is free to keep raking in the campaign cash from contractors who want to do business with the state while the courts sort out the constitutional issues. In other words, this is just another dodge."

Senator Don Harmon, sponsor of the bill in the Senate told the State Journal Register, he agrees with Jones' interpretation of when the time limit kicks in.

"I think we can take it up in November," Harmon said. "A lot of members would be happy to go down (to Springfield) sooner than that to get this done."

The State Journal Register's September 14th opinion stated,  ILLINOIS SENATE President Emil Jones' decision to not call his chamber back to work before the Nov. 12 veto session is profoundly disappointing."  The SJ-R also writes, "Jones may be correct in interpreting the state constitution as saying the Senate does not have to consider House overrides until 15 days after they are read into the Senate record. His interpretation runs counter to what had been widely accepted - that the Senate has 15 calendar days to act on House veto overrides or the entire bill dies. But there is sufficient ambiguity in the constitution to give Jones' take credence.

But we wonder why Jones would want to risk killing a state ethics bill that was years in the making, and which passed both houses of the General Assembly without a single no vote, over a detail like this. Many people believe, with good reason, that Blagojevich severely altered the original ethics bill - he says he improved it - so it would eventually die. By making the bill much more far-reaching, this logic goes, Blagojevich hoped to scare off lawmakers entirely. Jones would be his ally in this by squelching an override effort.

If you like conspiracies, it's a great plot. We'd prefer simple good government in which people who hold government contracts worth $50,000 or more can't contribute to the campaigns of the officials who issue the contracts.

Background

HB 824 has awaited the Governor's action for months.  Many state officials, including Comptroller Dan Hynes, have urged the Governor to act on the bill.  Hynes criticized Blagojevich for accepting more than $300,000 in campaign contributions the first half of this year alone from holders of contracts worth at least $50,000.

Hynes has told the State Journal Register, it appears that Blagojevich wants to amend the ethics legislation and send it back to lawmakers in hopes that the revised version will die. "I don't think the governor is at all sincere in saying he wants to go further. They've spent the last three years trying to stop reform," Hynes said.

Browse Open Book, a searchable database of state contracts and contributions.
http://www.openbook.illinoiscomptroller.com/

 
Budget Cuts
 
House Vote Sweeps $221 Million to Help Restore Budget Cuts
Now Waiting on Senate Action
 

Last week the House amended SB 790 to transfer $221,250,000 from special state funds to the General Revenue Fund (also known as fund sweeps).  The House bill identifies which funds to sweep as well as the dollar amount. 

The fund sweeps would be used to restore some of the $1.4 billion in cuts the Governor made to the fiscal year 2009 budget.

View which funds the House swept here and here.

Read the SB 790 here.

The plan's sponsor, Rep. Gary Hannig, D-Litchfield told the State Journal Register, "That money would allow historic sites and state parks to remain open."

The Senate must vote to approve the legislation before it becomes law. 

Special State Funds are various, smaller funds identified and held in the State Treasury as "special funds" under in Section 5 of the Illinois Finance Act restricted in use to the specific purpose for which they were created.

There are over 300 of these special state funds that support activities as diverse as medical assistance and environmental cleanup. They are, for the most part, designed as segregated accounts, restricted in use and funded from specifically earmarked revenue or fee sources. Examples include the Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund, the Youth Drug Abuse Prevention Fund and the Brownfields Redevelopment Fund. 

Since FY 2003, the state has transferred almost $1 billion from these Special State Funds to the General Revenue Fund.  However, this is not new revenue, it is simply a transfer of revenue from Special State Funds into the General Fund.  This revenue swap would not be available next year without legislative approval.

Read more about how the state transfers revenue from special use state funds to the General Fund on page 25 of the CTBA report, Citizens Guide to the Illinois State Budget and Tax System. The report contains a wealth of information on all of these budget issues.

The Senate would have to approve any fund sweeps bill passed in the House.


Background
 
Two weeks ago Governor Blagojevich announced that 450 state workers will be laid off along with the closure of 12 historic sites and 11state parks.  The cuts come as a result of the $1.4 billion in cuts the Governor made to the fiscal year 2009 budget. 

Four departments will be hit with the lay offs, including 300 positions at the Department of Children and Family Services, 75 at the Department of Human Services, and another 75 from the Department of Natural Resources and the Historic Preservation Agency.

According to the State Journal Register (SJ-R), the lay offs will be effective December 1st.  The historic sites will close Oct. 1st and state parks Nov. 1st.

 

 
The union that represents the laid off workers, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) along with state lawmakers told SJ-R the layoffs and closings were unnecessarily heavy just a couple of months into the new budget year that began July 1.

"Every time I think he can't do something worse, he does," Sen. Larry Bomke, R-Springfield, said of the governor.

AFSCME warned that the cuts will put abused children and needy families at risk and further hurt parks and historic sites. It urged lawmakers to return to the Capitol soon to try to reverse them.

"These cuts are irresponsible, and they are deep," AFSCME executive director Henry Bayer said.

Department of Natural Resources spokesman Chris McCloud told the SJ-R, "This is a tough day for DNR and Illinois."  Jonathan Goldman, executive director of the Illinois Environmental Council, said state parks had about 45 million visitors last year, and the resulting loss in economic activity probably will outweigh any savings.


The following Department of Natural Resources sites are scheduled to close Nov. 1:
 

Castle Rock State Park, Oregon
 
Lowden State Park, Oregon
 
Hennepin Canal Parkway State Park, Sheffield
 
Illini State Park, Marseilles
 
Channahon Parkway State Park, Channahon
 
Gebhard Woods State Park, Morris
 
Hidden Springs State Forrest, Strasburg
 
Kickapoo State Park, Oakwood
 
Moraine View State Park, Leroy
 
Weldon Springs State Park, Clinton
 
Wolf Creek State Park, Windsor


SJ-R: A list of how the cuts will affect historic sites.
 
From the Capitol
 
capitol dome

House Votes to Lease Lottery/Fund Capital Plan


Last Wednesday The House passed SB 2595, legislation to lease the State lottery to fund a capital program.  The bill calls for leasing 80% of the lottery for 50 to 60 years at the sum of $10 billion.  Of that, $7 billion would be used to fund a capital program (transferred into the new, GROW Illinois Fund, Capital Workforce Development Fund and Regional Transportation Authority Infrastructure Fund).  The remaining $3 billion would be invested in an education trust fund to replace lottery revenues that currently go toward schools (the money would be invested to send $600 million to schools each year).

The legislation requires the Governor, Comptroller, and Treasurer approve the lease agreement, eliminates the possibility for the new lessee from operating lottery games on the internet, creates the new Office of Gaming Enforcement, contains ethics provisions and requires that certain contracting parties must meet employment goals with respect to minority, female, and low-income employees.
 
No capital appropriation bill is moving right now.  House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Curry, D-Chicago, said to the Daily Journal that the measure only creates a potential funding source for the capital bill, but does not authorize any spending and that it was important to first see the bids from potential investors before spending the money.

"I would love to put a shovel in the ground tomorrow," Currie said. "There's no way we would have money to do that under this bill. The worst thing we can say to the people of the state of Illinois is, 'Here comes your capital program. Break out the shovels.'"

Curry added that before the spending portion of the capital bill is approved she would anticipate a project-by-project spending plan would be voted on by lawmakers.

Any legislation passed by the House must be debated and passed by the Senate.  It is unknown when if the Senate will convene prior to their scheduled veto session days.

The Center for Tax and Budget Accountability testified against leasing the Illinois State Lottery due to concerns over lost revenues for education.  Lottery revenues for schools usually increase each year.  Any proposal that sets up a flat funding mechanism to replace those revenues would mean a funding decrease for schools after accounting for inflation.  Further, sale or lease of a long term revenue generating asset to cover ongoing operational expenses is questionable fiscal policy.  Once the asset is sold or leased and the money spent the state loses all or most of the ongoing revenue, putting pressure on other revenue sources to cover the lost revenue.

Read: Sale of lottery won't be a panacea for state's woes, by CTBA Executive Director Ralph Martire.


 
School Funding Reform
 
House to Hold Education Funding Hearings

 
House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee chairman Mike Smith (D-Canton) announced that he will convene a series of hearings regarding proposals to reform the state's approach to funding public education. 

The public is invited and encouraged to attend the hearings to voice their opinion on this very important issue. 

 
  • Oak Park:  Sept. 18, 1:00 p.m., Oak Park Village Hall, 123 Madison Street
  • South Holland:  Sept. 30, 6:00 p.m., Thornwood High School, 17101 S. Park Avenue
  • Chicago:  Oct. 2, 6:00 p.m., Loyola University, 6525 N. Sheridan Road 
  • Lincolnwood:  Oct. 6, 7:00 p.m., Lincolnwood City Hall, 6900 N. Lincoln Avenue
  • Springfield:  Oct. 9, 1:00 p.m., State Capitol Room 118
     
 
"School funding is one of state government's primary functions and has wide-ranging ramifications for Illinois' future," Smith said.  "We are going to take the debate over education funding reform to the public and give taxpayers, education professionals, business and labor organizations, and civic groups a chance to have their say.  Through the information gathered at these hearings, lawmakers will be able to better weigh proposals to modify the state's education funding system."


CTBA will testify at several of the hearings as well as many of our partners at the A+ Illinois campaign.

 
Calendar
 
WHAT:  Money Matters School Funding Forum
WHEN: 
September 18, 2008
WHERE: 
Union League Club of Chicago
INFO:
  A public forum, data release and panel discussion convened by the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, Community Renewal Society, Catalyst Chicago, and The Chicago Reporter

Come hear new analyses of school funding inequities-including new data-in Illinois and what they mean for children  Listen to prospects for legislative and court action  Ask questions about these crucial issues.

Event Schedule

8:00 - 8:30     Registration & continental breakfast

8:30 - 9:00     Presentation of data

9:00 - 10:00   Panel discussion and Q&A

The panel discussion will include:

State Sen. James Meeks (I-Chicago),
State Rep. Roger Eddy (R-Hutsonville),
State Rep. David E. Miller (D-Dolton),
a representative from the Chicago Urban League,
and other key stakeholders and decision makers on the subject of school reform. 

The panel moderator is former State Sen. Dawn Clark Netcsh, who campaigned for school finance reform as part of her 1994 bid for Governor of Illinois.

Register on the CRS website here.

WHAT:
Dupage Federation on Human Services Reform, Making the Connection:  Accessing Public Benefits for Low Income Persons
WHEN: October 1, 8, 15, 22, 29
            February 18, 25
            March 4, 11, 18
            June 3, 10, 17, 24
            July 1
WHERE: All trainings held at NIU Naperville, 1120 Diehl Road, Naperville, IL
INFO: Making the Connection training sessions contain information in an easy-to-understand format regarding many programs available to assist low income persons.

Individuals who register for a Making the Connection training session now receive membership access to the Federation's newly developed Making the Connection Illinois website, www.mtcil.org.

To register and for more information please visit www.dupagefederation.org.

 

 


Do you have something to add to the Weekly Review?
email Chrissy Mancini @
cmancini@ctbaonline.org

___________________________________________________________________________


Center for Tax and Budget Accountability

70 East Lake Street, Suite 1700
Chicago, IL  60601
312-332-1041
www.ctbaonline.org
 

 
 
logo2